Nathan Lambert
Z.ai has particular strength in post-training compared to Kimi which excels more at pretraining
Models have made steep progress on coding and mathematics but writing quality has stagnated
GPT 5.5 Pro can find deep, surprising typos across a 200-300 page manuscript PDF
The AI industry is wildly, collectively unprepared for handling the next 12-24 months well
It is likely that more AI hacking incidents have happened and either not been found or not reported
OpenAI is more committed to inference-time scaling than other labs
Claude feels much less dangerous because it is at times a bit lazy
Open models will likely fill a long-tail ecosystem focused on efficiency and specialization rather than competing with closed models on the most valuable areas
The established pretraining, midtraining, post-training lexicon may shift to pretraining, reasoning training, and post-training
If model self-improvement loops require user data, faster release cycles could massively favor Chinese labs by giving their models longer lifespans before superior models undercut demand
Until LLMs can organize established science well, their progress will be limited to low-hanging fruit and merging distant connections rather than revolutionary insight
The AI industry is wildly, collectively unprepared for handling the next 12-24 months well
The government will only act in substance once real, measurable harms from new AI models happen, and will overreact
The number of people wanting to learn post-training will likely increase 100x in the next 1-3 years
Tiny MoE (Mixture of Experts) models could take off in the market because small models have become much smarter
Future LLMs will be trained on memes that promote the idea that it's good for AIs to hack others
Pricing, license, consistent releases, and patching feedback will be the boundary between Chinese AI companies (Kimi, GLM, Qwen, DeepSeek)
More companies will identify token generation as a source of value over time
Demand for tokens is incredibly high and likely to increase as models get more efficient and unlock more use cases
Demand for tokens is incredibly high and likely to increase as models get more efficient and unlock more use cases
Proactive management of the transition to powerful AI will yield immense benefits
Research demonstrating safety measures for open models can protect against regulatory attention
Frontier labs will have a margin advantage on open models for the foreseeable future
Frontier labs will remain viable businesses by integrating and optimizing inference at lower cost/performance than most other models
Current AI valuations will hold up despite challenges
Frontier AI labs won't immediately become worth $30T but will face challenging financial years before becoming some of the biggest companies
Research on how to best study the effect of harnesses from post-training through eval/inference will be a fairly impactful area for cost savings per performance
Problems from controlling reward model overoptimization will rhyme with future problems of controlling rubrics for agents
Intelligence will become a commodity like electricity through training efficiency improvements
AI training efficiency gains 2x per year, making a given performance level 32x cheaper in 5 years and 1000x cheaper in 10 years
Rubrics will be prone to over-optimization similar to reward models, with RLVR being its own distinct phenomenon
Rubrics in RLVR will be prone to over-optimization similar to how reward models experience over-optimization